His writings have inspired countless revolutions around the world and have shaped the course of modern history. This is troubling, considering that Marx has been regarded numerous times as the world’s most influential scholar. Most have only read superficial critiques of his ideas. or European university, you’d be hard-pressed to find a professor who has read at least half of Marx’s writings. If you were to walk into any major social science department in a U.S. Instead, they rely solely on watered-down interpretations by bourgeois “scholars” who misread Marx and have never done anything tangible for the world. Perhaps the biggest error committed is failing to properly study Marx’s writings and those of his ideological successors - Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong, among thousands of others. ![]() “It’s human nature to be greedy - that’s why capitalism will always win.” “It looks good on paper, but it doesn’t work out in reality,” his critics often say. They claim Marx’s ideas are irrelevant because a major socialist country carrying out his ideas was dismantled by counter-revolutionaries. Guided by misinformed perceptions about Karl Marx and the body of science he pioneered, these critics associate the collapse of the former Soviet Union with the collapse of Marxist science as a whole. ![]() The Ignored Birth Of A Foundational Pluralism, by Antonino Drago.- Analytical Index.These are the words that anti-communists typically use when attempting to describe Marxism and its central tenets. Maitte Bernard.- Historical Reflections On The Physics Mathematics Relationship In Electromagnetic Theory, by Raffaele Pisano.- The Interaction Of Physics, Mechanics And Mathematics In Joseph Liouville's Research, by Jesper Lützen.- Mathematical Physics In The Style Of Gabriel Lamé And The Treatise Of Emile Mathieu, by Évelyne Barbin And René Guitart.- The Emergence Of Mathematical Physics At The University Of Leipzig, by Karl-Heinz Schlote.- On Boundaries Of The Language Of Physics, by Ladislav Kvasz.- The Relationship Between Physics And Mathematics In The XIX Century. It brings together contributions from leading experts in the field, and gives much-needed insight in the subject of mathematical physics from a historical point of view.įoreword.- Mathematical Physics In Italy In The XIX Century: The Theory Of Elasticity, byĭanilo Capecchi.- The Construction Of Group Theory In Crystallography, by The purpose of the Symposium and this book is to gather and re-evaluate the current thinking on this subject. Recently, much historical research has been done into mathematics and physics and their relation in this period. The link by which physical ideas had influenced the world of mathematics was not new in the 19 th century, but it came to a kind of maturity at that time. Of course this problem is related to the links between institutions, universities, schools for engineers, and industries, and so it has social implications as well. The authors explain the various ways in which this science allowed an advanced mathematical modelling in physics on the one hand, and the invention of new mathematical ideas on the other hand. So the main question is: When and why did the tension between mathematics and physics, explicitly practised at least since Galileo, evolve into such a new scientific theory? ![]() The aim of this book is to analyse historical problems related to the use of mathematics in physics as well as to the use of physics in mathematics and to investigate Mathematical Physics as precisely the new discipline which is concerned with this dialectical link itself. Bringing together contributions from leading experts, and offering much-needed insight, this book analyses historical problems in the use of mathematics in physics, the use of physics in mathematics and the emergence of the discipline of Mathematical Physics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |